Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Put Kids First

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Put Kids First (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable non-profit organization. Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk) 13:13, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No evidence that any secondary sources exist for this at all. Surprisingly non notable. Perhaps the organization needs a less generic name? Gm545 (talk) 13:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Once you get past the false positives that show up for things in other countries and the various things that use the phrase "put kids first", there really isn't a lot out there. I can find news stories that quote the organization's founder, but those don't count towards notability- those just show that she's been quoted. I found one YT video of the founder getting interviewed, but it looks like it was posted by the organization and not the news station's official channel, so we can't really use it. Even if it was, that's one source and we'd need multiple such sources. The goal of the organization is noble, but we can't keep pages based on whether or not we like the cause they're championing. We have to be able to show notability, which just doesn't seem to be there. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 16:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.