Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pussy Posse Girls
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Dakota 06:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- del promo of nonnotable burlesque group. 34 unique google hits. `'mikkanarxi 05:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, provides solid evidence of local (AZ) notability, but nothing more. Xtifr tälk 07:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: to an untutored eye, the article does not appear to be written as a promo, and appears to assert notability outside performance, in re their contacts with LEOs, and the non-pursuit of this. Simon Cursitor
- Delete as advertising a non-notable performer group. JIP | Talk 09:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KeepDefinitely local interest, but not solely, given the troupe's affiliation with the national fetish scene, reference sources outside Arizona, and presence on the Web.Gutterkitty 16:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: User Gutterkitty's only edits are to the Pussy Posse Girls article and this AfD. JIP | Talk 06:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: That is true. I am new to Wikipedia. But for the record, I have no professional affiliation with this troupe and did not write the entry as a "promo."Gutterkitty 18:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough, I was just checking. There have been cases in the past where people have written promotional articles about things they're associated with. JIP | Talk 21:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I see mention of "National Aspirations" for the group, but no real evidence that they have achieved any notability beyond their local scene. There is one non-AZ source cited, but that one seems of dubious notability itself, not to mention questionable reliability. I think this group may well be on its way to achieving notability, but I don't think they've "arrived" yet. It won't hurt anyone to wait for a while before creating a Wikipedia article, so I counsel patience. Xtifr tälk 20:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.