Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purulent Excretor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It looks like there is a rough consensus that there is insufficient reliable source coverage to ring the WP:N bell. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:31, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Purulent Excretor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BAND due to lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 18:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep thanks for relisting separately, this one has a number of references on the French wikipedia article including magazine articles so it seems to pass WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 22:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 22:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~ Delete: Atlantic306, the French Wikipedia article may well have references, but none of them look like they pass RS to me. The bulk of the biography is referenced to the band's own (very badly made) website, and the other four are two references to user-generated Wikis similar to the "Encyclopedia Metallum", and two blogs. Richard3120 (talk) 02:39, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Admittedly, I only have only a basic understanding of French but a Google Translate does seem to support Richard3120's assessment. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 08:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Richard3120. All I can find are links to blogs. Zubizuva (talk) 23:57, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:42, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.