Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purity Device

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 00:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Purity Device[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I removed the {{db-band}} tag because notability is asserted by this review of one of the band's albums from Tsunami Magazine. I do not think this short review is enough to establish notability though, so have brought this article to AfD.

A Google News Archive search returns no valid results. This band appears to fail Wikipedia:Notability (music). If reliable sources are found to establish notability, I will withdraw this AfD nomination. Cunard (talk) 07:17, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 14:14, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 14:15, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 20:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.