Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purdue Exponent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) HistoricalAccountings (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Purdue Exponent

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The current article cites very few sources, and the sources that it cites are only those that verify the job and credentials of a single alumna who has her own Wikipedia page. One of the sources listed is "Purdue Exponent staff," with no further specification, indicating that there may have been a WP:COI involved in the creation and editing the page. I've looked, and I can't find any reliable sources that make reference to the newspaper in any non-trivial way. For that reason, the paper does not appear to meet WP:GNG and the page should be deleted. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 07:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 07:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Unfortunate that sources were not added to this when written, but some I found include [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Reywas92^Talk 00:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Some of the sources from Reywas92 are more clear qualifiers than others, but ones such as 6 and 7 are very solid. There are also several articles from the SPLC here. Overall, passes GNG. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 05:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.