Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purananoorru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -- Jonel | Speak 23:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Purananoorru[edit]

This appears to be a hoax. Bachrach44 14:51, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain. I got 188 hits. Not much, but it's likely not something that one person invented. We should contact someone familiar with the issue. Punkmorten 15:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Purananuru (that gets 35,000 google hits) and keep the redirect. It looks notable and verifiable enough based on this amazon link. - Bobet 17:53, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I cleaned the article up a bit to make it more presentable. - Bobet 18:00, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Now keep per Bobet. Punkmorten 10:20, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as random poem collection with little notability. Stifle 01:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, how can a 2,000 year old poem anthology that people still care enough about to translate be not notable? - Bobet 01:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to Purananuru or Purananooru Tintin Talk 03:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to Purananuru; create a redirect from Purananooru. --Gurubrahma 05:58, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Tintin =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. It's a very significant piece [of] work in ancient Tamil literature. Move and keep the redirect per Gurubrahma. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 05:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to more common spelling. --King of All the Franks 05:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep, move title to "Puraana-nooru" or "Purana-nooru", maybe without hyphen if people prefer not to have it. ImpuMozhi 07:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Seconding Sundar. Kingsleyj 00:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep. most certainly encyclopedic. Kingturtle 09:24, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Ganeshk^T/_C\^@ 13:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep by moving - as per Gurubrahma and Tintin --ΜιĿːtalk 17:24, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.