Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pungeon crawler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. Please note that this article does not fall under WP:CSD#G4 because it has never been deleted as the result of a deletion discussion. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 22:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pungeon crawler[edit]

Non-notable term used once on a podcast this week. Rob Banzai (talk) 03:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Note to closing admin: Unless there's some strange outside chance that this article is kept... please note that this article was PRODed a few days ago, and the creator of the article vowed to re-create it over and over if it was deleted. It appears as though they are following through on that promise. For that reason, please consider a delete and salt. (I've already voted delete below.) Randomran (talk) 16:08, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Word madeup on a podcast - while still more notable than 99% of everything else that falls under WP:MADEUP - that is not difficult to achieve, and it is still madeup nonetheless. Also, the dubious source: http://www.justin.tv/...Pungeon_Crawler_source_for_the_wiki_page, looks like it was created specifically as a source for the article. ~ AmeIiorate _{U T C} @ 03:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete junk. JuJube (talk) 04:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MADEUP and subsequently WP:NOTE, WP:V, and WP:NOT#OR. Barkeep^{Chat | $} 04:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly made up. If you watch the video that they claim as a "source".. They even say "put that on Wikipedia". -Brougham96 (talk) 05:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is WP:OR and also fails WP:MADEUP. You look better naked (talk) 11:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 11:12, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MADEUP. (article was also already deleted via WP:PROD) MrKIA11 (talk) 11:12, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable neologism from a single source Ohconfucius (talk) 12:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this made up single source neologism! -- JediLofty ^{Talk to me}_{Follow me} 13:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete per WP:MADEUP and WP:NEO. Show me how more than one person has actually used this term in any serious way, and explained what the heck it means with any detail. Randomran (talk) 15:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete (G10) and salt — Judging from the video, the purpose behind this article seems to be to game the system and to wikibash Wikipedia. MuZemike (talk) 16:44, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Judging from the video, this is moronic. I mean that in the most WP:civil, WP:NPOV way I can possibly mean that. Randomran (talk) 17:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - My recommendation or the article? MuZemike (talk) 17:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Haha, the article. Or at least the video that supports making this article. "PUT THIS SHIT ON WIKIPEDIA". Morons. Randomran (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt the sucker. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. I was the original prodder; my reason of "Neologism with no claim of meeting WP:Notability. Zero google hits; zero gnews hits" still stands.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:01, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt per, er, everyone. Speedy because it's snowing.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 01:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Salt the earth of this mindless garbage and send it to the pungeon. Violates WP:MADEUP and should have been speedied as nonsense. Nerdluck34 (talk) 02:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Deletion Note — While it does not quite meet G10, it certainly does meet G4, and I will WP:BOLDly tag it as such and squash this AfD. MuZemike (talk) 22:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.