Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulsamerica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pulsamerica

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a speedy as G11 (promotion) by User:Drmies, but after stubbing the article to remove promotional content I am not finding significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The only such source is the COHA profile, which isn't sufficient for notability. I may not be looking in the right places. Fences&Windows 21:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Fences&Windows 21:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Fences&Windows 21:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can't see any either, and I'm going with delete. Drmies (talk) 22:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 22:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. AnotherEditor144^{talk contribs} 08:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.