Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pull Up refactoring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. However, "inarticulate and unencyclopedian" is not a policy- or guideline-based reason for deletion. Kurykh (talk) 00:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pull Up refactoring[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not a notable subject. It might be worth merging some of the article into the refactoring article and leaving a redirect Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (without prejudice): Only one sentence (the lead) of this article is valuable. That sentence is already in the code refactoring article. —Codename Lisa (talk) 03:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Inarticulate and unencyclopedian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxanthippe (talk • contribs) 23:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.