Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puerto Galera Yacht Club
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 14:40, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Puerto Galera Yacht Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete, fails notability standards, was on the edge of a csd but figured because it does participate in a national race it might have the barest claim to pass csd. No references provided and partially promotional in nature as added reasons. Also fails WP:CORP Hell In A Bucket (talk) 05:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete although the subject has received passing mention in multiple non-primary reliable sources, if added together it is my humble opinion that if added up they do not sum up to be significant coverage of the subject. Therefore, failing WP:GNG, WP:ORG, & WP:CORP, deletion is in order. Perhaps it is too soon for the subject to have an article; if significant coverage is created in the future, the article can be recreated with verified content. Presently the majority of the content in the article is subject to WP:BURDEN.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It just hasn't received enough significant coverage from reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:51, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.