Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Insight Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Minnesota Public Radio. ✗plicit 12:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Public Insight Network

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, promotional language, advertisement-like lead. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NOR and WP:NCORP. The only reason why it doesn't fail WP:NPOV is because there is ZERO sources here for an editor to possibly misrepresent. WP:BEFORE returned no reliable sources talking about this organization. 🔥 22spears 🔥 06:01, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, News media, Organizations, and Business. 🔥 22spears 🔥 06:01, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The Public Insight Journalism / Network appears to have been an initiative under American Public Media / Minnesota Public Radio (2008 short Huffpost commentary on APM, Niemann Reports (2005) article by someone at MPR/APM). Possible merge/redirect targets? AllyD (talk) 07:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No worries merging per AllyD, as the article is short enough to be a section without cutting content. (And it will be even shorter after cutting the promo stuff) small jars tc 10:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Which target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 13:34, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Probably merge to Minnesota Public Radio, seems to be the main media body.

Oaktree b (talk) 13:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Minnesota Public Radio as per above. Did not find sufficient reliable coverage to justify a stand alone article. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 04:43, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.