Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychedelic combatant
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Dakota 18:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No Google hits and no sources, possible WP:HOAX. jd || talk || 00:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unnotable bio, vanity or a hoax. --Alex (Talk) 00:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Sr13 02:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to be nonsense. Main author deleted the first speedy deletion nom, and vandalized Franz Kafka with similar nonsense. Caknuck 03:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nonsense. Would a speedy-G7 apply here since the author, who was the only actual contributor to that point, blanked the article before the AfD was added? [1]. Resolute 03:14, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom: nonsense WP:HOAX Jpe|ob 03:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but on two grounds - if not the fact that it is poorly written and the subject is non notable, then delete because (at least, to me) it sounds like an autobio written third person - and badly, at that. --Dennisthe2 03:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete insane rant. Danny Lilithborne 04:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Hello32020 12:38, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't trust this at all. ReverendG 21:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.