Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psych IRL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Psych IRL[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

YouTube account that does not meet criteria of WP:NWEB. The articles provided as sources are not about the account, it's only mentioned as an entry in various lists. The HuffPo piece is a contributed article and not written by a staff member. I am unable to find significant discussion of the account in multiple reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 02:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 02:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - only minor coverage from third party sources, not enough to meet NBIO.-KH-1 (talk) 03:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no good significant coverage, fails WEBCRIT (in WP:NWEB). dibbydib 00:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.