Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psifiako Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Article deleted per WP:CSD#A7, WP:CSD#G11 and WP:SNOW. Guy (Help!) 14:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Psifiako Media

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this company meets WP:CORPDEPTH as I can find no substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. The article is just a free advertisement for the startup company. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I found people are searching about this company on Facebook & other platforms including Google but no proper two line information has given. so I created this article with as much as reference links I could cite. if this gets deleted it's okay I have nothing to do with this company.

but I'll add more citation or more needed information if I find it on google. IZinePro (talk) 14:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources as required by WP:CORPDEPTH. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:02, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. Close to an WP:A7. Any references are in low-grade RS and not significant pieces on the company. Strong WP:PROMO. Britishfinance (talk) 21:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, for lacking significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 19:11, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.