Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protected!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Protected!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found zero significant coverage for this film. Two of the actors are notable, but WP:NF says "The film features significant involvement (ie. one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career. SL93 (talk) 21:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This film is not notable per WP:NF, and the only two cast members who have Wikipedia articles are not famous enough to transmit notability to the film. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The film was one of those speedy-created for a 48-hour film project[1]... where a filmmaker has his writers and cast all lined up and waiting... And is then handed a few details which must be part of the film, such as genre type, prop to use, and phrase to include. Once getting the information there is a mad rush to write their script, shoot their film, edit the project, and then submit a completed film... all within a 48 hour period. Been in one myself,[2] incredibly frantic pace but fun to do. But RARELY do such ever gain required notability for inclusion herein... and this is one of those that does not. It exists, yes. But no awards and no coverage means no notability per WP:NF. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article, feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Stuarteates. Crappy videos have ended up becoming notable as a first project of a notable director or actor (see The Journey of Jared Price), so this could be notable, but I see no evidence it's there. Bearian (talk) 01:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DaveApter (talk) 20:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.