Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prosperity for Posterity Party

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to William Bayley. — The Earwig talk 09:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prosperity for Posterity Party[edit]

Prosperity for Posterity Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived political party that was effectively a one-man show (its only candidate was its founder) and folded during the election. As the man in question, William Bayley, passes GNG, and as the party's only claim to fame is his involvement, I suggest merging this page into William Bayley. — Kawnhr (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Kawnhr (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — Kawnhr (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. — Kawnhr (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge As the party is mentioned in William Bayley and the fact that it consisted of 1 person is kinda curious (even though I believe it's not the only case in the world) I believe merging would be a doog option. Less Unless (talk) 11:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge As above explained. Sliekid (talk) 09:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.