Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prosody Creative Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Meh; funny about the sigs. Sr13 is almost Singu larity 05:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prosody Creative Services

Marketing company involved in several notable events, but no indication that the company itself is well-known per WP:CORP. Also, given that author is User:Prosody07, there's a conflict of interest. NawlinWiki 16:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently gathering sources that will support the fact that Prosody is a notable event marketing company. Expect some more sources and information in the next few days. Am I right in believing that unless these changes do occur, the article will be deleted on August 4th? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Prosody07 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 30 July 2007.

If you don't have the sources now, you should wait to post the article until you have them. See WP:V. An AFD discussion ordinarily lasts for five days. NawlinWiki 16:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Delete- conflict of intrest, and per nom, see the name of the user that's editing it. The sunder king 16:45, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N and WP:V. Note also that I have indefinitely blocked the author's username due to its inclusion of the company name. (I made sure it wasn't the user's surname first.) -- But|seriously|folks 16:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, thinly disguised spam, conflict of interest. Realkyhick 17:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Save: I think the company is noteworthy enough.- LysanderAOP — Preceding unsigned comment added by LysanderAOP (talk • contribs)
- — LysanderAOP (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
I agree with LysanderAOP. The company worked with Jamestown, plus the page looks pretty good already. User:Gooooba 2 August 2007
- — Gooooba (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete. Failed WP:CORP and it's a WP:SPAM. — Indon (reply) — 14:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Save. I don't think it failed WP:CORP and it is not a WP:SPAM. — theycallmemistapig (reply) — 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- — Theycallmemistapig (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Save. I checked the corporations rules, and there isn't anything that would clearly state a reason why this can't be an artilce. Read it for yourself and see! WP:CORP — (reply) — 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- — Rubbadubba (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
As someone who participated in some of the events listed, I say keep. I went to ANNIVERSSARY WEEK-END and it was beast. — FIGHTING MAN FROM THE BEACH (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Acalamari 21:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to closing admin: I'm suspecting the author created multiple sockpuppets to raise voice here. There are a lot of single purpose account for this topic only. (The funny thing is that these sockpuppets copy pasted my signature literally) — Indon (reply) — 07:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.