Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Properception
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Proprioception. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 03:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Properception (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While working with Wikipedia with a psychology lab on campus, it was pointed out to me that "properception" isn't actually a psychology/psychiatry term. The closest term is proprioception, which has its own article. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 'speedy redirect as a possible mis-spelling. DGG ( talk ) 05:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to proprioception as a possible mis-spelling. JIP | Talk 07:18, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No, the article states "properception is related to proprioception" so the author was clearly aware that the terms were distinct.--Pontificalibus (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any evidence of this. The first version of the article doesn't make any such mention. It wasn't until over a year and half later that the distinction to proprioception was added to the article, by a different user. JIP | Talk 20:10, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No, the article states "properception is related to proprioception" so the author was clearly aware that the terms were distinct.--Pontificalibus (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. Possible mis-spelling of proprioception, but also because half of the article is about proprioception, which does in fact seem similar to "properception". Rm1271 talkcontribs 00:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If anything, the article appears to be about interoception.--Pontificalibus (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No such word, a redirect would therefore be confusing and unhelpful. --Pontificalibus (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to proprioception. This seems to be a rare variant spelling – Google Books shows this word used in a handful of books. -- 202.124.74.36 (talk) 01:39, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to "Proprioception". Plausible misspelling. Axl ¤ [Talk] 16:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.