Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Propel (PHP)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Propel (PHP)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was PRODed four years ago because it didn't meet notability standards. A user (who is now indefinitely banned) reversed the PROD. The edit history nor the talk page actually gives a reason for the PROD. I still don't think this article meets notability guidelines, and I can't find any sources that would make it meet these guidelines. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, no indepedent sources found. Quuxbazbarfoo (talk) 17:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect: I am not finding evidence of attained notability. It has a line entry in List_of_object–relational_mapping_software#PHP so an ATD redirect to there could be an outcome. AllyD (talk) 21:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.