Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promoting Empowerment Through Awareness of Lesbian and Bisexual Women

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting Empowerment Through Awareness of Lesbian and Bisexual Women

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIGCOV. Predominace of company website refs and some interviews. scope_creep^Talk 12:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Belize. Shellwood (talk) 13:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet either WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:40, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, though if a good redirect target is found I'd be open to redirect this page and selectively merging a few short sentences that would be WP:DUE. This covers Petal in decent detail, though, on second look it could be press-release/routine announcement like that could fail WP:CORPDEPTH e.g., PETAL’s primary objective is to empower women particularly Lesbian and Bisexual women by increasing their knowledge of a wide cross section of issues that impact them direct /indirectly is exceedingly similar to PETAL’s aim, like its name stipulates, is to empower women – particularly lesbian and bisexual women – by increasing their knowledge of a wide cross section of issues that impact them, directly or indirectly from their own Facebook page, it also promotionally links to the site's email under contact details. Therefore, whether this is a completely independent source that constitutes of significant coverage meeting WP:CORPDEPTH is dubious IMO. Reference 2 covers the organisation in decent detail, however, it is interview-like, primarily quotes from the founder and also covering the founder's personal life and general views instead of being exclusively about the company, making WP:CORPDEPTH debatable. With only two references that at best debatably/probably not passes WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NCORP is likely failed. I discussed with the creator to potentially merge/redirect this to somewhere as a WP:ATD, e.g., List of LGBT rights organisations in Belize, though that has been draftified as well into Draft:List of LGBT rights organisations in Belize. VickKiang (talk) 20:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.