Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Projectvisitor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Projectvisitor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Video game of questionable notability. Some external links, but largely unreferenced. Reads like a fan page. Using the relevant terms from the article, a Google search on "Project Visitor" "Conundrum Studios" shows only 117 unique results, with little significant coverage from independent reliable sources - a lot of blogs, unreliable, and primary sources, tho. "Project Visitor" Postlinear is just as bad. "Project Visitor" SegaSoft shows only 61 results, none from reliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I guess - I can't find any reliable Ghits, Gbooks, or Gnews about this game. Most MMORPG'S aren't notable, and this one doesn't seem to be a exception. --Madison-chan (talk) 22:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.