Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prohibitionists in Manitoba (provincial candidates) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Delete (without prejudice to the inclusion of information like this into Manitoba general election, 1903, as that information already apparently exists at Prohibition in Canada) j⚛e decker ^talk 19:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prohibitionists in Manitoba (provincial candidates)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Removed PROD per WP:PROD (Previous AfD exists). Rationale in PROD was: None of these candidates have articles, the 'party' has no article, none of them were elected. I can find no coverage in sources, and no indication that this topic meets the notability criteria for inclusion Illia Connell (talk) 07:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete I've moved the info into Prohibition in Canada, albeit without citations. It seems more appropriate as a couple of sentences there than as an article. Mangoe (talk) 13:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. —Ed!^(talk) 15:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Manitoba general election, 1903. Since this was the only election the party contested, it seems like the most appropriate place for this information. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:21, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 12:26, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.