Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profit Point, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 23:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Profit Point, Inc.

No evidence of notability, persistently unreferenced, CoI, and reads like an ad. —SlamDiego_←T 20:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable company, far too advert like.Paste (talk) 21:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a Google News archive search turns up insufficient coverage in reliable sources to meet our notability requirements. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Explanation from the Contributor -- I am not an expert in Wikipedia standards -- I contribute on matters that I am familiar with... So, forgive me if the group determines that this is not-notable, however IMO this company is notable. In the last two months alone, the company's analysts have authored cover stories for two notable industry magazines: Supply Chain Quarterly and Outsourced Logistics. The company is also at the forefront of developing supply chain software in the emerging area of environmental sustainability - a nascent, but important aspect of dealing with the climate change challenge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtaus (talk • contribs)
- “Notability” doesn't possess the sort of transitivity presumed here. Writing for a notable periodical, occasional, or anthology doesn't make one notable; working to respond to a notable problem doesn't make one notable. —SlamDiego_←T 19:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.