Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profezia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The proposed sources have remained uncontested. Sandstein 22:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Profezia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Did not find any sources to show its notability. Looks to not be notable enough for its own page. GamerPro64 17:33, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. GamerPro64 17:33, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I went looking and found some print sources: Discussed in this book on the Italian video game industry; feature on the game in Player.it; featured multiple times in Computer+Videogiochi, the Italian edition of Computer and Video Games ([1][2][3]), reviewed by the Italian Amiga Magazine, discussed in Italian magazine K, mentioned in dev interview in The Games Machine. Archive.org also indicated that it was featured in Edge, but the actual magazine was unavailable and I could not tell what issue it was in.--Alexandra^IDV 13:04, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Alexandra. The developer was significant in Italy at the time and the sources Alexandra's already uncovered are just the beginning of what will be available in foreign languages. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 10:34, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.