Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional wrestling promotion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Luna Santin 03:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'd just like to say that I considered this entry's previous content, a listing of all of all known professional wrestling promotions around the world, an unprecedented and indispensible resource for English-speaking wrestling fans everywhere (which, of course, is the very type of content a user-modified encyclopedia should strive to provide). I was shocked and saddened to see this immense patchwork of efforts removed from Wikipedia, and strongly encourage anyone with the capabiltiies to restore this entry's former information to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bboyce17 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 23 September 2006
- Well, as someone said, if the former information is to return, then it must be done on a proper list page. 24.7.217.221 20:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and comments: I believe that this article is worth keeping due to the fact that it lists every wrestling promotion that ever existed. As such, the page should be redone as a list page. 24.7.217.221 16:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep just as is - no need for it to be a list, especially since all that will do is attract crowds of non-notable backyard feds. It's a good definition and collection of links to major groups now. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete We have Category:Professional wrestling promotions that contains all notable wrestling promotions. The category is much more inclusive than the list ever was, (looking thru the diffs proves this,) and is much easier to maintain than a list would be. --Roninbk t c # 20:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think this article should stay and be revised their is alot more information on how they are run and with some effort can really be an informative article GShton 21:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and clean up the listcruft. This could be a useful article on defining what a promotion is and what it's role in the wrestling industry is. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 23:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.