Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prof. Vinod Kumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per WP:G11 by Orangemike (talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. AnturiaethwrTalk 18:14, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prof. Vinod Kumar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Notability not established, no independent references, fails WP:ACADEMIC, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 11:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 11:52, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete This article is a recreation of Vinod Kumar deleted in 2008 and Prof. Vinod kumar created in 2009. It still fails WP:N. I don't have access to the deleted version but I believe it was promoting the same svtuition.org back then, so this appears to be deliberate spamming (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/svtuition.blogspot.com for further analysis). Examining the page history, I particularly enjoy the rationale for PROD removal was to reference his own blog entry; a special treat was his recommendation that this was the best education system (you thought this was about accounting, right?) because you learn Sanskrit and hear from "the true voice of God". Speedy. Now. Ash (talk) 13:16, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as blatant advertizing and salt for repeated recreation of spam.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 15:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. JL 09 ^_{q?_c} 15:28, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.