Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Producer "Billboard"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Producer "Billboard"[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Adspam/unsourced BLP about a musician with purely local and unverifiable claims of notability; first album yet to be released, being a YouTube "phenomenon" is neither quantifiable nor appropriate as a claim of notability, and CJFM-FM is not the worldwide Virgin Radio network; its playlisting decisions for local musicians have no bearing on any other station with the Virgin branding. ttonyb (talk) 21:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This was not listed in the daily logs. It is listed now. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. (GregJackP (talk) 02:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Recommend delete. No references, notability not established. Cullen328 (talk) 00:59, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - He may be come notable in the future but the lack of coverage indicates he is not notable now. -- Whpq (talk) 16:24, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.