Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prodigious Savant
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge with Savant syndrome. bibliomaniac15 20:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Prodigious Savant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can't see any difference between this definition and that of a "savant". The PROD was deleted by the user, so i've moved it to XfD. Ironholds 04:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL shows that the term is used to describe someone different from the run of the mill savant. Please check the Book and Scholar results especially. One says, "The term prodigious savant is reserved for those very rare persons in an already uncommon condition where the special skill or ability is so outstanding that...". Another says, "The prodigious savant represents a very high threshold group and there are probably less than 100 such known persons living worldwide at the present time." Currently the Savant article is small enough to accommodate this article, and the average user actually expects this definition when they look up "savant". (As did the nominator.) So Merge or Keep but do not delete. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 05:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Savant syndrome. It does introduce a bit of new information here and there, but I don't think it's sufficiently distinguished to warrant a separate article. - Vianello (talk) 03:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge seems the most sensible course. It is, at most, a kind of savant. maxsch (talk) 15:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.