Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Problems and solutions of undetected firearm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Nick-D (talk) 00:43, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Problems and solutions of undetected firearm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original research and essay. The title hints at a copyvio, but I can't find it yet! Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Don't know about copyvio, although it may very well be, but definitely original research. – Alex43223 T | C | E 10:08, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:OR. Tevildo (talk) 12:03, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Looks like OR - not 100% sure what point he's trying to make anyway. Peridon (talk) 00:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - original research or personal reflection. - Richard Cavell (talk) 12:45, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I am afraid Franciscrot (talk) 13:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry to hear that, Francisrot. Is it because of the article? - Richard Cavell (talk) 14:23, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as OR - and very poorly written at that. Eddie.willers (talk) 23:39, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.