Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Wrestling Report

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SorryGuy Talk 18:30, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Wrestling Report[edit]

Unsourced article of dubious notability, the article contains some extreme claims these are not supported by third party sources. Given the creator seems to be a single purpose account and only editor there is also a case to be made for a conflict of interest. –– Lid^(Talk) 03:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as advertisement, OR and no notability. Hard to believe that a show that is only available on teh Internets and on Milwaukee cable TV is "the world's most watched pro wrestling program". KleenupKrew (talk) 03:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Judging by how many g-hits are discussions of the show, it seems to circulate in the wrestling fandom world. I'm not totally convinced either way. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'd be hard-pressed to figure that 47 unique G-hits were evidence of any measure of circulation. Obviously there is a small handful of fanboys who care about this vblog, but that's not remotely enough to pass WP:WEB or meet WP:V. RGTraynor 15:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:19, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless coverage in reliable sources is provided to show notability. Terraxos (talk) 02:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.