Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Wrestling Federation of Pakistan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (see discussion at User talk:Anthony Appleyard#Time to close AFD)Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:23, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Wrestling Federation of Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This wrestling promotion does not appear to meet WP:NORG. All the sources in the article are either self-published or based on press releases, and I'm not finding anything better through Google. I note that the article creator is a blocked sock who has previously tried to promote non-notable Pakistani wrestling content. I am also nominating all articles in Category:Pro Wrestling Federation of Pakistan, which are even less notable than the parent organization:

PWFP Ultimate Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
PWFP World Heavyweight Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
PWFP World Wrestling Champions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Seems to be a fairly notable fed at least in Pakistan, and unless I’m missing something, we have pages for the specific championships which aren’t up for debate? Copper1993 (talk) 02:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    They are. I bundled them with this AfD. Do you really think that fewer than 8k followers on Facebook and 2k followers on YouTube is "fairly notable"? Regardless, your comment doesn't present a policy-based reason to keep, namely how this federation meets WP:NORG. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 02:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non-notable organisation, a single piece in The News based on a media announcement (so press release based coverage) doth not WP:GNG pass, let alone WP:ORG. Also take on board that the articles were created by an indeffed user. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:47, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&6=thirteen () 12:43, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.