Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProPay (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ProPay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wondering they have not put their whole profile into one wikipedia article. the most miserable highest degree of promotions. Another fin-tech with no encyclopedia notability. No-notability of this organization. If we have to make a Wikipedia page for being an encyclopedia in this manner. wikipedia is not a portfolio or directory of such company. Light2021 (talk) 14:50, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt as 3 deletions in 2007 is a suitable sign as it is, and this is still as blatant an advertisement as it ever could be, therefore we have to face the honesty and see how blatantly advert-like it's been maintained and we never make compromises with such blatancy. Information and sources are so largely advertising, it cares to list, not only its advertising but its list of employees.... SwisterTwister talk 20:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A ton of coverage, but nothing more than brief mentions. Not enough to establish WP:CORPDEPTH. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:WEBHOST; WP is not a platform for the corporate materials. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.