Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Rajasethupathy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Priya Rajasethupathy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GScholar count is low, less than a single page, and as an assistant professor fails WP:Prof scope_creep (talk) 22:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can find one paper on GS with 256 cites. That is excellent but far from enough in this highly cited field. At the moment this looks like WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.