Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Rai (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:13, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Priya Rai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any specialized guideline other than WP:PORNBIO. Per the consensus application of PORNBIO in the Christopher Ashlee AFD, winning a "group scene" award along with eight other performers does not satisfy notability requirements. Original AFD resulted in deletion and 2009 group award is only added claim of notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep she won a major award and has being nominated as an AVN starlet[1][2][3] Dwanyewest (talk) 00:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - criteria 1 of PORNBIO isn't debatable for an AVN award. Group or not. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in agreement with User:Morbidthoughts. That an award is awarded for a group activity does not minimalize the award, else a baseball team wining a pennant would also then not be notable in that the penant was awarded for the team's efforts. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
'"Keep'" in argreenent with morbid thoughts. She's a fairly well known performer.Kathartic (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:53, 18 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Keep as per Morbidthoughts. Clearly notable. --80.192.21.253 (talk) 19:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:PORNBIO and User:Morbidthoughts.--Morenooso (talk) 04:22, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:PORNBIO: she won a major award. Clearly notable. -- fdewaele, 19 April 2010, 9:22 CET.

Criteria one of porn bio eh! If that is what makes this person notable enough for a wikipedia biography then it needs changing. The citations are awful promotional and sales, there is no independent coverage of her at all, she has done nothing of note at all in her life. Off2riorob (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Morbidthoughts. Dismas|^(talk) 04:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Priya has recently been featured in the opening scene of a recently released 3d adult movie "Octopussy a XXX Parody 3D", of which I referenced and cited (article is on AVN.com and in AVN magazine). There are VERY few Indian American adult actresses and since she has started working in the industry she has become very popular. I and others have come to find that quite a few ethnic men and women in the adult industry are being targeted for deletion. AlexandraMayers (talk) 04:11, 21 April 2010 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above, and WP:HOTTIE. Textbook case. Dekkappai (talk) 21:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL... never knew that page existed. <G> Tabercil (talk) 23:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's the only policy I believe in more than WP:IAR ;-) Dekkappai (talk) 23:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Last I looked at PORNBIO was still a valid set of criteria, and the article is sourced (albeit on the thin side...) Tabercil (talk) 23:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.