Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Privoxy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Privoxy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. No independent sources cited, and no significant coverage in suitable sources found. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Privoxy is historically important. That doesn't carry much weight in a deletion discussion, but, luckily, I was to find reviews: LinuxFormat via TechRadar, PC World, and a smaller review from Wired. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:52, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I found a few more sources and added them to the article. I think it makes a credible claim to notability now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Antarctica (₵) 03:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per NinjaRobotPirate's additions, which appear to be enough to meet WP:NSOFT. Gongshow talk 07:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep articles in Dr Dobbs, PC World and Linux Format show notability as multiple reliable sources independent of the creators. Nice finds, NinjaRobotPirate! --Mark viking (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.