Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pritam Singh (RJ Preetam Pyare)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seems to be clear consensus that he is not yet notable DGG ( talk ) 07:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pritam Singh (RJ Preetam Pyare)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is neither asserted nor verified. Fiddle Faddle 07:21, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bigg Boss 8. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON, but at the moment, his notability is based only on being on the show and the typical Z-list celebrity gigs offered to such contestants afterwards. Boleyn (talk) 07:50, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The Youtube, Tunein.com and Haathichiti.com sources fail WP:BLPSPS in my opionion, but I'm not sure about the "I Just Love Movies" cite. Even if that's OK, it and the Big Boss 8 cite do not seem to be enough to establish notability for a stand-alone article. In addition, I indirectly came across this AfD from this Teahouse question. The editor, Toshwets, who posted that question also just has started working on Draft:Pritam Singh (Actor, RJ). From the Teahouse question, it appears that Toshwets is a close childhood friend of Pyare and wants to ensure that Pyare's Wikipedia article does not hampers the [Pyare's] image and career in the long run. It also seems as if the actor (Pyare) the page is written about wishes to create a new page and block this page. All of that seems not only contrary to WP:NOT, but also an apparent COI. Deleting this article might be the proper thing to do, but that might give the impression that a new one (more favorable to Pyare perhaps) can simply be created in its place. Not sure if that falls under the purview of this AfD, but I felt it should be mentioned. - Marchjuly (talk) 08:49, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: FYI: the editor submitted the draft at AfC yesterday but was rejected. I'm not sure whether the user understands the AFC process. He inquired on my talk page, seeming rather upset about the rejection, and I suggested that he work on this article instead of creating a concurrent draft. wia (talk) 13:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect. The subject doesn't stand up on its own for an article, if there is a plausible search term, it should redirect to the above noted article. --Jayron 32 14:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 20:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 20:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to a lack of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:38, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Another page on same person Pritam Singh (Actor, RJ) has been created. I have nominated that for CSD WP:A10. 220 of ^Borg 05:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected that page to the first page. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 07:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This page will do nicely. If not keep, Userfy/Draftify. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 07:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- This article is currently supported by Facebook, Google Plus, IMDb, and similar unsuitable sources, including circular links back to Wikipedia. Would you mind explaining your recommendation to keep? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - There are at least 3 suitable sources. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 06:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Due to lack of proper notability right now. Let him become more famous. --C E (talk) 13:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.