Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscila Sol (pornographic film actress) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Priscila Sol (pornographic film actress)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. Claimed award is a token trade show honorific, given out only once it in the award's two-decade history. It's also odd to see a Brazilian performer winning an award for best French starlet, and casts further doubt on the award's significance. In any event, a niche award like this is insufficient to demonstrate notability in the absence of independent, reliably sourced content. Negligible independent RS content. No RS biographical content. No nontrivial GBooks hits; Substantive GNews hits appear to relate to a different performer of the same name. 2008 AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscila Sol. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep AVN nominations count for notability. Snood1205 (talk) 19:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you might want to reread pornbio, nominations count for nothing. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete unsourced blp. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- the nominations do not count. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - NOTE: I have recently edited the article under consideration here. The subject here has "won a well-known and significant industry award", namely the Venus Award for "Best New Starlet Female - France", which is very similar to the AVN Award for Best New Starlet & the XBIZ Award for Best New Starlet. The Venus Awards "are unique" in the adult film industry "in that directors, performers, and films from the same country (Germany, France, the United States, etc.) compete for honors with other entities from that same country", and winners from or related to France have won awards many times at the Venus Awards in the past. Guy1890 (talk) 03:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete~~Delete~~ Came here from WP Brazil. Did some research. Read other pornbio AfDs. Read WP:Pornbio. The crux of this debate seems to be exactly whether the Venus Award counts as a "significant industry award". I would not say so from it's wikipedia page at Venus Award. I'm using wikipedia as the source for whether it is significant, and just comparing it to the article on AVN award it falls far short of "significance". I think this amount of research should be enough to determine my vote.--User:Dwarf Kirlston - talk 15:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update:changed to weak delete, I had been a bit bothered I mean the AVN awards are supposedly "the oscars of porn" and have 100,000 visitors, while Venus awards have no such parallel (can you imagine "the Cannes of porn"?) but still have a sizeable crowd of 40,000. The crowd for the festival is additionally IMO not really relevant to the notability/significance of the award. The AVN is significant as the main award in porn, but I am not sure to what extent the Venus Award is or is not significant. I think either way the article is on the threshold, barely notable or not notable.--User:Dwarf Kirlston - talk 14:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Hasn't won any significant awards, no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 03:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.