Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Print publication

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Publication. Sr 13 03:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Print publication[edit]

Not only a Dictionary definition, but a silly dictionary definition; "A print publication is a publication done via printing". A bit like the Brown envelope article which was deleted earlier, I was interested to learn it's an envelope that's brown. Masaruemoto 02:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merge & make redirect to publication, adding the point to the lead. It's actually a perfectly valid & important distinction.Johnbod 02:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to publication, I bet at some point in the future such a distinction will be necessary but not today. Naufana : talk 03:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to publication. Oyster guitarist 05:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary, then feel free to create a redirect to publication. Stifle (talk) 21:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.