Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principality of Ongal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Croatia–Serbia_border_dispute#Liberland_and_other_claims DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 00:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Principality of Ongal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable "micronation". No residents. "lends (sic) are a previous Nature park and no inhabitеd forest, there are no permanent residents, the Principality have no population on the ground and any other form of government type or elections are impossible." Even a micronation must have residents. See Montevideo Convention. No recognition. Very limited media coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Even by micronation standards, this doesn't qualify. John Nagle (talk) 22:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~Redirect. I was involved in trimming down the article back in 2015 (the old cruft has made it back in since), and then in the consensus decision to redirect. Options for the redirect are Terra nullius and Croatia–Serbia border dispute. I'd suggest the latter, as it's a good article, and it's where the other non-notable micronation, Enclava, now redirects to (having previously been pointed to the Terra nullius article section[1]). It's where ~~Kekistan and~~ Autia will go, if they go anywhere. Bromley86 (talk) 23:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection or merging to Croatia–Serbia_border_dispute#Liberland_and_other_claims seems reasonable. John Nagle (talk) 02:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, I wouldn't like to see more than a cursory mention over there (such as we already have) myself. This is what the Ongal article looked like before its proponents reverted to a pre-review version (i.e. pretty thin, once you take out the background already in the Croatia-Serbia border dispute article). It had previously been a redirect for nearly a year.[2] Bromley86 (talk) 23:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There seem to be more than a few wild claims on that territory. I think we should merge them all into a List of micronations claiming Croatia–Serbia terra nullius (feel free to suggest a better title). Daß Wölf 19:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Croatia–Serbia_border_dispute#Liberland_and_other_claims. No such user (talk) 06:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.