Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principality of Ongal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. The nomination is proposing the action of copy editing the article to reduce it to a stub, rather than outright deletion. As such, this is not a valid rationale for deletion. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. Discussion regarding the article can continue on its talk page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:12, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Principality of Ongal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aside from being in very poor quality English, which could be taken care of by a heavy copy-edit, the length of this article is is far too long (undue weight) compared even to the other claimed microstates resulting from the Croatia-Serbia border dispute. Article should be stubbed. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stub as proponent. (Efforts to trim article by normal editing have resulted in edit-warring, so AFD is way to achieve community consensus.) Robert McClenon (talk) 02:21, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:09, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.