Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principal Airlines
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Aerolínea Principal. Sandstein 19:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Principal Airlines[edit]
- Principal Airlines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not pass WP:ORG and I could not find evidence of its existance on either GNews or regular Google. A speedy was declined on this, so I didn't want to send it to prod. DARTH PANDAduel 12:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The article content is very odd, possibly due to being written by somebody not entirely proficient with English. The article is written in the future tense, but refers to dates in the past. Also, the web site for the airline consists of a splash page and nothing else. Apparently they have a fleet consisting of a single plane. The airline appears to exist as a very small charter company but there needs to be better sourcing than this single link I've found. -- Whpq (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -- Since this is on a Chilean airline, it is not unexpected tha the article should be in fractured English. The article appears to claim aircraft of three types. Is this a significant enough airline to warrnat an article? Can a Spanish speaker, please see whet that Spanish WP says? Peterkingiron (talk) 21:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'm pretty sure that no other wiki has an article on said Airline. If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me with a link. DARTH PANDAduel 21:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep- After some digging around, I've found [1], [2], and [3]. I imagine that somebody actually proficient at Spanish instead of relying on machine transalations as I did might have better luck at tracking down better sources. The ones I found are rather small mentions. -- Whpq (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Aerolínea Principal since there is an existing article. Or in the alternative, simply redirect as it is not clear what informastion in the current article is properly sourced from the one reference given the confusion over how many places they even fly based on searching. -- Whpq (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 18:21, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Non-notable, charter carrier. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Aerolínea Principal the same airline. Move anything worthwhile to main article. MilborneOne (talk) 13:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.