Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Elisabeth Maria of Bavaria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:57, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Elisabeth Maria of Bavaria[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article exists solely as a genealogical entry, yet Wikipedia is not a genealogy website. The woman married, had children, remarried, and had more children. She was deprived of her status as a minor royal in childhood and lived a very ordinary, private life. Neither media nor academics have had any interest in it. An encyclopedia does not need to cover her. Surtsicna (talk) 14:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 14:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 14:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 14:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above. Balle010 (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 15:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Another example of deposed monarchy cruft, although this one really was a princess for the first 5 years of her life, she was only the great-granddaughter of the King of Bavaria, which makes her claim to notability tenuous. PatGallacher (talk) 20:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the other comments above. Smeat75 (talk) 14:05, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Her only reference is a deprecated source. JoelleJay (talk) 18:45, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a genealogical database to be filled with members of deposed royal and notable families.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. I give wide latitude to notability, but she's not remotely notable; finding significant coverage at this time would be remote. Bearian (talk) 20:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.