Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince of Persia: Ghosts of the Past
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 04:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Prince of Persia: Ghosts of the Past[edit]
- Prince of Persia: Ghosts of the Past (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
There is no sources, no links or any references to confirm that the video game is even in production. The whole article is made up of rumours, and until Ubisoft confirms the game's development, it really doesn't warrent it's own article. Another option is merging the page or redirecting it to a more relevant article, until the game is confirmed. We should get an administrator to delete it, because some unregistered user keeps removing the deletion tags, so if anyone can contact an admin about this, that'd be great.--EclipseSSD (talk) 16:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete can't find any reliable source aside from rumors and the leaked pictures. If there are still no offical annoucement from Ubisoft then this article violates WP:CRYSTAL.--Lenticel (talk) 03:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's pure fiction, AND terribly written. It's hard for me to think of rules this article doesn't break. --Impossible (talk) 03:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete found nothing on the Ubisoft website. This is WP:CRYSTAL all the way through Doc Strange (talk) 15:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 15:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - completely unsourced speculation -- Whpq (talk) 17:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR and WP:CRYSTAL. --MrStalker (talk) 08:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.