Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince of Orange Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn per WP:HEY. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prince of Orange Mall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability asserted. No sources found. Some incidental coverage such as this, but almost every source on Gnews seems trivial (mentioning it only in one sentence). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:28, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:59, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:59, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I have added references and made some progress in improving the article, so I think it is worth keeping now, as its the only enclosed shopping mall in its metropolitan area and thus a hub and notable fixture in the community. My rationale is similar to my rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lagrange Mall.--Milowent (talk) 13:49, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as improved article meets the verifiability and notability thresholds. Kudos to Milowent. - Dravecky (talk) 14:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.