Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Ofosu Sefah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:52, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Ofosu Sefah

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable politician who doesn’t satisfy WP:NPOL as he is merely a party member. Furthermore the first source used in the article lacks editorial oversight & the second and third are both not independent of the subject hence this overall is also a GNG fail. Celestina007 (talk) 15:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 15:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 15:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 15:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 15:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A person who holds a senior role with his country's broadcast regulator (as in the FCC, the CRTC or OFCOM) could certainly get in the door if he could be shown to clear WP:GNG on his sourceability — but it's not an automatic notability freebie that guarantees him an article just because he exists, and neither is anything else stated in the article. And as for the sourcing, two of the three footnotes are to content on the self-published website of his own employer, which is not notability-building sourcing — and even the one source that is a real news article in real media is not about him, but merely quotes him giving soundbite on a subject other than himself, so it isn't enough to singlehandedly get him over GNG all by itself if it's the only real media source in play. Bearcat (talk) 18:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's no personal coverage of him in WP:RS and this is basically just a resume. FalconK (talk) 05:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW, NPOL, and WP:MILL - he's a mid-level bureaucrat and party functionary. Bearian (talk) 22:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.