Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Nathan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:08, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Nathan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Secondary character from a small comic, of so little importance to it is is mentioned in our article about said comic once in plot summary and then in 'see also'. I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by User:Andrew Davidson with no rationale outside citing WP:DEPROD (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD); I also don't understand why Andrew removed the {{notability}} using the justification of the WP:TAGBOMB essay (since a single template is hardly bombing the article, and the article does not contain any assertion of notability, so the tag seemed and still seems perfectly justified). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Very minor character, fails notability guidelines. Delete per nom. Waxworker (talk) 03:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - covered in sufficient detail at Prince Valiant, and anyone knowledgeable enough about the subject to search this term can find that article without the help of a redirect. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.