Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prime Transport Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus indicates a lack of notability. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Transport Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough as per links provided. GreenCricket (talk) 11:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Having trawled Google for notability, I find it somewhat a dubious subject. I find nothing relating to the company worded in current tense and no notable news stories (other than a BBC World Service entry in 2006) since its conception. On that notion I support deletion of the article. Nordic Nightfury 12:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. doesn ot appear to have evidence for notability . If sucessful, there would certainly be better sources. DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.