Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prime Suspects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 08:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Suspects

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete declined prod; completely unreferenced, and WP:BEFORE reveals no sources that rise to the level required by WP:NBAND. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Their album reached no. 36 on the Billboard 200 and 14 on the genre chart, which satisfies WP:NMUSIC, and sources for this are easy to find ([1], [2]). There are other sources which could be used in the article, e.g. [3], [4], and likely more in 1990s print sources. --Michig (talk) 09:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as passes criteria 2 of WP:NMUSIC with releases charting on a national chart as confirmed in reliable sources with other reliable sources coverage so deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.