Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prime Ministers Global Fellowship documentary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to John Walsh (filmmaker). (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 13:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Ministers Global Fellowship documentary[edit]

Prime Ministers Global Fellowship documentary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of a series of articles being created by this editor for the work of John Walsh (filmmaker), I can find no evidence that this 30-minute doc meets WP:NFILM or WP:TVSHOW. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • After being deleted, we can redirect to the John Walsh article. Though this 2009 documentary film lacks the coverage or commentary to meet WP:NF and merit a separate article of its own, we can at least send readers to the one location where it might be mentioned. Schmidt, Michael Q. 01:33, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Swarm we ♥ our hive 06:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • REdirect as suggested. I doubt we need an article about a TV programme that has sunk without a trace after its first broadcast 6 years ago. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:16, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.