Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pricing in Proportion
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 22:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Pricing in Proportion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about the Royal Mail pricing structure. The article fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTCATALOGUE. Tentinator 10:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Assuming it shouldn't be preserved somewhere as a near perfect example of WP:NOTCATALOGUE. TimothyJosephWood 15:10, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.